Home | Download | Demo | Feature list | Premium users | Support | Knowledgebase
How to fix WMI Access is denied. (Exception from HRESULT: 0x80070005 (E_ACCESSDENIED))
The network path was not found - The RPC server is unavailable. (Exception from HRESULT: 0x800706BA)
How to configure Windows Vista clients.
How to configure the windows firewall using group policies.
   
Welcome Guest Search | Active Topics | Members | Log In | Register

Lansweeper is a killer product Options
BullGates
Posted: Wednesday, February 13, 2008 12:05:50 AM

Rank: Premium user
Groups: Member , Premium Users

Joined: 9/29/2007
Posts: 48
Location: PT
I have to give the congrats to Moernaut for such great product. At our company we will buy the premium tools, to support you on such great product. PO is on the way...

Now some of the features we need/use at our environment, maybe this can help you with some features:
- on the vnc push client, we have the need to ask the client to allow the connection, this way we preserve the user privacy, he has to explicitly allow the admin connection to his desktop (I've done this based on vnc, now I need to adapt it a bit to integrate with Lansweeper)

- some of the custom actions, I've implemented and I can share if someone is interested:
. sap logon restore (users sometimes delete entries, with a click I can restore it)
. schedule a disk check on the next reboot
. check if someone is really logged on (using psloggedon)
. clean local obsolete profiles (older than 6 months)
. recreate important shortcuts that the user removes
76012
Posted: Wednesday, February 13, 2008 3:36:45 PM

Rank: Premium user
Groups: Member , Premium Users

Joined: 2/7/2008
Posts: 31
I am interested in your custom actions. Please post if you can... Thanks!
tstock
Posted: Thursday, May 15, 2008 6:36:59 PM
Rank: Freeware user
Groups: Member

Joined: 4/7/2008
Posts: 6
Location: Montrose, CO
I just wanted to say, I think Lansweeper is an awesome product (I haven't donated yet, but I will shortly). I love the upgrades you have put into 3.1. The interface is so much faster (and looks cool too). I want to send this into TechNet magazine's Toolbox column and see if you can get published there, but I want to get your permission first. My experience, if you get posted on there, you will receive a lot of hits. Maybe you have already been featured in that column, I don't know.
Lansweeper
Posted: Thursday, May 15, 2008 7:12:21 PM

Rank: Administration
Groups: Administration

Joined: 2/10/2005
Posts: 1,560
Location: Hamme Belgium
Lansweeper is relatively unknown at the moment (if you compare it to the 30000 spiceworks users) so all publicity is welcome.
On the other hand, Spiceworks has a 8 million dollar budget
Optilan
Posted: Friday, May 16, 2008 4:00:12 PM

Rank: Premium user
Groups: Member , Premium Users

Joined: 1/24/2008
Posts: 13
Location: UK
Yeah and this is WAY better than spiceworks, so expect 8 million dollar's in the mail when everyone realises that. :)

Optilan Communication Systems
www.optilan.com
taeratrin
Posted: Tuesday, August 12, 2008 3:58:43 AM
Rank: Freeware Advanced Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 8/11/2008
Posts: 72
I just started using (testing) this product in my organization's network, and am so far very impressed. I was trying several others out before I found this (Zenoss, Spiceworks, Hyperic, etc), but none have provided the functionality I needed. I hated that they were all server-focused and only really provided the ability to view information. With the custom actions (combined with psexec and nircmd), Lansweeper stands above them all. I have seen some commercial software that provides alot of these functions, but the cost is ridiculous ($100 per node is not feasible when you have 500+ nodes).

There are just a few suggestions I have that would make this the ultimate product :
1) Use WMI instead of registry to gather information. I don't like having Remote Registry enabled.
2) More interaction with AD. It'd be nice to, instead of having to run the lsclient on each computer you want monitored, just pull in a the list of computers from AD. It'd also be nice if it would report OU's when viewing users and computers. I imagine this wouldn't be that hard to put in myself, but I haven't spent all that much time with it.
3) Along the same lines as above, more control of AD. Renaming computers, resetting passwords, add/remove from group, etc. would all be great features as I'd imagine most people using this are doing tasks like these on a regular basis (at least, I know I do)

There are a few others that may occur to me in the future, but all-in-all, it's a great program.
Lansweeper
Posted: Thursday, August 28, 2008 10:39:18 PM

Rank: Administration
Groups: Administration

Joined: 2/10/2005
Posts: 1,560
Location: Hamme Belgium
taeratrin wrote:

1) Use WMI instead of registry to gather information. I don't like having Remote Registry enabled.
2) More interaction with AD. It'd be nice to, instead of having to run the lsclient on each computer you want monitored, just pull in a the list of computers from AD. It'd also be nice if it would report OU's when viewing users and computers. I imagine this wouldn't be that hard to put in myself, but I haven't spent all that much time with it.
3) Along the same lines as above, more control of AD. Renaming computers, resetting passwords, add/remove from group, etc. would all be great features as I'd imagine most people using this are doing tasks like these on a regular basis (at least, I know I do)


1) Most scanning is done by WMI, except for the custom registry keys which most people use.
2) All this will be in version 3.2 for premium users.
3) You can already accomplish this if you use the right actions with a vbscript.
taeratrin
Posted: Thursday, August 28, 2008 10:52:14 PM
Rank: Freeware Advanced Member
Groups: Member

Joined: 8/11/2008
Posts: 72
Lansweeper wrote:


1) Most scanning is done by WMI, except for the custom registry keys which most people use.


Then why does it not report anything at all if Remote Registry is disabled? I know from my own scanning programs that you don't need RR for WMI to work.
Lansweeper
Posted: Thursday, August 28, 2008 10:54:58 PM

Rank: Administration
Groups: Administration

Joined: 2/10/2005
Posts: 1,560
Location: Hamme Belgium
Before the scan starts the service does a check for 3 requirements and reports the errors in the database
- Wmi access
- remote registry access
- fileshare access

If one of these checks fail, the computer is not scanned and is considered "not good configured", then the error is reported in the interface so the administrator can correct his mistake.
Matt Sullivan
Posted: Friday, September 12, 2008 8:56:43 PM

Rank: Premium user
Groups: Member , Premium Users

Joined: 9/11/2008
Posts: 1
Location: Alabama
I'll agree. I found Lansweeper while looking for inventory software. I've been using it for almost 8 months in my network and its work flawlessly. It's helped me troubleshoot machines, find "who's using what", as well as tying user to machines.

3 days ago I decided to go ahead and spend $150 - people, its only $150 - for the premium and MAN is it awesome. I installed the AD piece and it worked immediately, so I scrapped my Group Policy script that was scanning before. And the client free remote control is awesome. And the remote screenshots? Web based? Come on guys. If you're responsible for managing even 10 machines, all of these features will save you TONS of time and money. No more "going up to the 4th floor to help out a user" for me.

All of it has worked flawlessly for me. I highly recommend it. Great work.
Users browsing this topic
Guest


Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.


Copyright © 2003-2006 Yet Another Forum.net. All rights reserved.

   
Quick links: Download - Premium users - Support 
Copyright 2004 - 2008 © Geert Moernaut - Hemoco bvba - All rights reserved